That's how I read it, and it sounds better than ohesten. (But that's another flame fest altogether.)Īs for nomenclature, it'll always be ohesex to me. in fact there are those who say Windows is still not ready for the enterprise yet, "datacenter" product versions or no. You know, the same kinds of applications NT started out with. Apple will be selling this into Schools, for workgroups and to creative types, not into the enterprise market.
#Mac os x server 1.0 mac os x
I think Ellison already certified the Mac OS X java implementation for the client side.Īpache/PhP/MySQL is hardly an enterprise-level solution. I'm fairly certain Apple will have their own brand of remote admin tools. Not that putting a pretty face on Unix isn't a major feat in itself.Īnd the same services as everyone else (I'm really reaching here. I mean, for 1995 OS X 2.0 wouldn't be a bad solution, but nowadays it's at best a UNIX with a pretty UI
![mac os x server 1.0 mac os x server 1.0](https://docs.moodle.org/2x/ca/images_ca/d/d8/moodle-on-macosx-server.png)
but its hard to say what version number the Apple site refers to.Īnd even though 2.0 may be better in terms of friendliness and integration, one has wonder about Apple's ability to deliver a well-rounded server OS that people will actually prefer to Solaris, Linux or NT. How can you expect Apple to provide an overall solution of comparable quality just like that?Īs for nomenclature, it'll always be ohesex to me. NT has been around for close to a decade. Now, go out and look at the amount of work Microsoft has put into NT support and resources. People say Microsoft's enterprise support is poor. What other reasons would you have to need OS X? I guess you might replace small NT/SFM servers with OS X if you have a few Macintosh clients to support, but that's about it. "Have you tried rebooting your Macintosh, sir?"
#Mac os x server 1.0 how to
Imagine calling up Apple's tech support with a question about WebObjects development and how to integrate with MySQL. Etc.)Īnd there's another problem: OS X Server is sold and supported by a vendor with zero experience in the enterprise. Where's X for remote admin? Where's Oracle for OS X? Apache/PhP/MySQL is hardly an enterprise-level solution. I mean, for 1995 OS X 2.0 wouldn't be a bad solution, but nowadays it's at best a UNIX with a pretty UI and the same services as everyone else (I'm really reaching here.
![mac os x server 1.0 mac os x server 1.0](https://virtuallyfun.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/OS-X-Server-1.2-MacOS-9-Start-Install.png)
That's what the logo was all about.Īnd even though 2.0 may be better in terms of friendliness and integration, one has wonder about Apple's ability to deliver a well-rounded server OS that people will actually prefer to Solaris, Linux or NT. I know OS X Server 2.0 is different, but both nibs and myself were talking about version 1.0.